Litigation accepting claims right now
Every claim below is active national litigation with attorneys currently accepting new cases. If any of these circumstances match your experience, a free two-minute review tells you whether you qualify — and what your filing deadline is.
Updated continuously
The active docket
Talcum Powder
For women diagnosed with ovarian or fallopian tube cancer after years of regular talc powder use.
Check eligibility → High priorityDepo-Provera
For women diagnosed with a meningioma or brain tumor after using Depo-Provera injections.
Check eligibility → Accepting claimsBard PowerPort
For patients injured by fracturing, migrating, or infection-causing implanted port catheters.
Check eligibility → Accepting claimsBladder & Vaginal Mesh
For women who needed surgery to repair or remove a bladder mesh, sling, or transvaginal mesh implant.
Check eligibility → High prioritySocial Media Addiction
For families of minors who suffered serious mental-health harm linked to Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat, or YouTube.
Check eligibility → Accepting claimsCA Women’s Prison Abuse
For survivors of sexual abuse by staff in California women’s facilities. Fully confidential.
Check eligibility → Accepting claimsTrafficking Survivors
For survivors of sex trafficking at hotels and motels. Fully confidential.
Check eligibility → 3-year deadlineMotor Vehicle Accidents
For people injured by another driver’s negligence in Mississippi. Three-year filing deadline.
Check eligibility →What these claims have been worth
Reported settlement and verdict ranges in comparable national litigation
| Litigation | Basis | Reported range |
|---|---|---|
| Talc / ovarian cancer | Individual settlements, reported | $100K – $1.2M |
| Transvaginal & bladder mesh | Revision-surgery claims, reported | $40K – $450K |
| Implanted port catheter | Device-failure claims, reported | $75K – $600K |
| Social media / minor harm | Bellwether stage — no global settlement | Pending |
| Depo-Provera / meningioma | Bellwether stage — no global settlement | Pending |
Amounts describe outcomes publicly reported in comparable litigation and are shown for context only. They are not a prediction, promise, or guarantee. Every case turns on its own facts, and most claims resolve for materially different amounts — or for nothing at all.
Client outcomes
People who almost didn’t call
“I had put it off for two years because I assumed a lawyer would cost money I did not have. The review took four minutes and I was on the phone with a firm that had handled my exact device the same afternoon.”
“What I needed was somebody to tell me plainly whether I had a case. They did that, in writing, without pressure, and without asking me for a card number at any point.”
“My daughter's situation was hard to talk about. The intake specialist was careful with her and the attorney they matched us with had already handled dozens of these claims.”
Clients are identified by initial and state to protect privacy. Testimonials describe individual experiences and are not a guarantee of any result.
Not sure which claim fits your situation?
Call and describe what happened. A case specialist will tell you which litigation applies, or tell you plainly that none does.